8.7.3.19 Only One Preferred Embodiment is Required

Date Published

Key Legislation


Key Related Topics 

There is no obligation on the applicant to describe more than a single preferred embodiment (Ethyl Corporation v California Research Corp. (1970) AOJP 562). If more than one method of performance is provided, the better or best method need not be identified.

Furthermore, the method of performance need not include an actual example; it may be described in general terms. Therefore, where the applicant is able to "fully describe" the invention such that the method of performance is implicit, the absence of an example in the specification is not objectionable.

This document is controlled. Its accuracy can only be guaranteed when viewed electronically.

IP Australia | Delivering a world leading IP system