We are currently developing a new site to host the Patent Manual of Practice and Procedure. The BETA version of this site is now available for you to review. The information and content displayed in the BETA site is only available for testing purposes. Do not use or reference the information in the BETA site when making any decisions or actions regarding IP rights.

2.4.8.3 Mere Presence in Claim Does Not Ensure Essential

Date Published

Although examiners should initially assume that all features of the independent claims are essential (see 2.4.8.2 Features of a Claim prima facie Essential), the mere presence of a feature in an independent claim is not conclusive proof that it is essential.

In Catnic Components v Hill & Smith Ltd (1982) RPC 183 at page 228 it was stated:

"the fact that a claim incorporates a particular feature does not alone suffice to make that feature an essential one. If this were not so, no feature of a claim could ever be inessential, but the speeches in Rodi and Wienenberger* all assume that a claim may include an inessential feature."

* Rodi and Wienenberger v Henry Showell Ltd (1969) RPC 367.

Back to top