We are currently developing a new site to host the Patent Manual of Practice and Procedure. The BETA version of this site is now available for you to review. The information and content displayed in the BETA site is only available for testing purposes. Do not use or reference the information in the BETA site when making any decisions or actions regarding IP rights. Bias as a Result of Other Proceedings Involving the Same Parties

Date Published

The fact that a hearing officer has been involved in earlier proceedings in relation to the same matter, e.g. an extension of time or a sec 104 amendment, does not disqualify that person from hearing subsequent proceedings, such as the substantive opposition, because of an apprehension of bias (see Re J.R.L.; Ex Parte C.J.L., 161 CLR 342 at 352).

Where a party raises concerns that a hearing officer has previously decided some of the same matters in an earlier decision, the considerations set out in Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 1243 will provide useful guidance.

Back to top