Welcome to the new version of the Patents Manual. Please note there are changes to the numbering and sequence of the chapters and pages in the manual. You are encouraged to take the time to explore and familiarise yourself with this new structure.

5.6.8.13 Treatment of Human Beings

Date Published

Note that under s18(2), human beings and the biological processes for their generation are not patentable inventions (see 5.6.8.14 Human Beings and Biological Processes for Their Generation).

Therapeutic Treatments

Therapeutic treatments, that is, processes or methods for medical treatment of the human body having economic utility are patentable following the decision of the High Court in Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd (2013) HCA 50, which concerned a method of preventing or treating psoriasis by administering leflunomide. It was held (at paragraph 286) that:

“Assuming that all other requirements for patentability are met, a method (or process) for medical treatment of the human body which is capable of satisfying the NRDC Case test, namely that it is a contribution to a useful art having economic utility, can be a manner of manufacture and hence a patentable invention within the meaning of s18(1)(a) of the 1990 Act.”

However, the Court acknowledged there is a distinction between such methods of treatment and the activities or procedures of doctors (and other medical staff) when physically treating patients, for example, surgical procedures (Apotex v Sanofi-Aventis supra at page 287).

Cosmetic Treatments

Cosmetic treatments, that is, processes or methods for improving or changing the appearance of the human body or any part of it, having a commercial application are patentable (Apotex v Sanofi-Aventis supra; Bernhard Joos v Commissioner of Patents (1972) 126 CLR 611). In the latter case, the claim was for a process for improving the strength and elasticity of keratinous material, especially human nails and hair, by applying a particular composition.

Note that the approach of the PCT and some foreign jurisdictions, such as the EP, is to regard methods of treatment as non-patentable subject matter.

Note: that the approach of the PCT and some foreign jurisdictions, such as the EP, is to regard methods of treatment as non-patentable subject matter.

Amended Reasons

Amended Reason Date Amended

Published for testing

Back to top